Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] place cherry pick line below commit title
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 30, 2016, 20:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqtwcx8669.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq8tu99o75.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes: > >>> I vaguely recall that there were some discussion on the definition >>> of "what's a trailer line" with folks from the kernel land, perhaps >>> while discussing the interpret-trailers topic. IIRC, when somebody >>> passes an improved version along, the resulting message's trailer >>> block may look like this: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Original Author <original@author.xz> >>> [fixed typo in the variable names] >>> Signed-off-by: Somebhody Else <somebody@else.xz> >>> >>> and an obvious "wish" of theirs was to treat not just RFC2822-like >>> "a line that begins with token followed by a colon" but also these >>> short comments as part of the trailer block. Your original wish in >>> [*1*] is to also treat "a line that begin with a whitespace that >>> follows a line that begins with token followed by a colon" as part >>> of the trailer block and I personally think that is a reasonable >>> thing to wish for, too. >> >> If we allowed arbitrary lines in the trailer block, this would solve >> my original problem, yes.
Here is an experiment I ran during my lunch break. The script (attached) is meant to run in the kernel repository and for each log messages of each non-merge commit:
* find its last paragraph, where the definition of paragraph is simply "a blank/empty line";
* inspect if there is at least one RFC2822-header-looking line, or a line that begins with "(cherry picked from";
* dump the ones that do not pass the above criteria.
My cursory look of the output did not spot a legitimate trailer block that we should have identified. The output lines shown were ones that are not signed off at all (e.g. af8c34ce6ae32add that says "Linux 4.7-rc2"), ones that has three-dash line "---" in them (e.g. 133d558216d9), ones that has diffstat that should have been after "---" (e.g. 259307074bfcf1f).
The story is the same if you run it in git.git; the "do we have at least one rfc2822-header-looking line or '(cherry picked from' line in the last paragraph? if so, then that is an existing trailer block" seems to be a good heuristics to cover many cases like these:
d0196c8d5d3057c5c21a82f3d0113ca8e501033b
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
[tomi.valkeinen@ti.com: resolved conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> 59f0aa9480cfef9173a648cec4537addc5f3ad94
Link 1: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/25/282
Link 2: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9399
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12461
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11880
Link 3: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14081
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14086
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14446
Link 4: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>-- >8 -- #!/bin/sh
git log --no-merges |
perl -e '
sub flush {
my ($commit, @lines) = @_;
my $seen_good = 0;
for (@lines) {
if (/^[-A-Za-z0-9]+: / ||
/^\(cherry picked from/) {
$seen_good = 1;
last;
}
}
if (!$seen_good) {
print "\n$commit\n";
for (@lines) {
print;
}
}
} my (@lines, $this);
while (<>) {
if (/^commit (.*)$/) {
my $next = $1;
flush($this, @lines);
@lines = ();
$this = $next;
}
if (s/^ //) {
if (/^\s*$/) {
@lines = ();
} else {
push @lines, $_;
}
}
}
if (@lines && $this) {
flush($this, @lines);
}
'