Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 1, 2017, 20:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqtw2vnbho.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAP8UFD2hghBePr-WVLiA6P0rS5=JPLmsxqJ_6rEWrqG3VEd7Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> I think it would be good to ensure the >> interface is robust and performant enough to actually replace the current >> object store interface (even if we don't actually do that just yet). > > I agree that it should be robust and performant, but I don't think it > needs to be as performant in all cases as the current object store > right now.
That sounds like starting from a defeatest position. Is there a reason why you think using an external interface could never perform well enough to be usable in everyday work?