Re: [PATCH 1/3] t2018: cleanup in current test

>>  test_expect_success 'checkout -b to a new branch, set to HEAD' '
>> +       test_when_finished test_might_fail git branch -D branch2 &&
>> +       test_when_finished git checkout branch1 &&
>
> I'm aware that when-finished actions fire in reverse order but the
> inherent subtlety of ordering of these two invocations still caught me
> off-guard for a moment since they are reverse the order in which one
> logically thinks about the actions which need to be performed. I
> wonder if it would be easier to digest if written like this:
>
>     test_when_finished '
>         git checkout branch1 &&
>         test_might_fail git branch -D branch2
>     ' &&