Re: [PATCH v3] tab completion of filenames for 'git restore'

"David Cantrell via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

Perhaps

    Subject: [PATCH v3] completion: complete modified files for 'git restore'

cf. Documentation/SubmittingPatches::[[summary-section]]

Since it is our convention that the first paragraph talks about the current behaviour, i.e. without the proposed changes applied, in the present tense, I'd assume the above is what the current code does.

What do you mean by "--args" in this sentence? Dashed-options? I am getting the same set of files whose name begins with 'a' from these two:

 $ git restore a<TAB>
 $ git restore --staged a<TAB>

so, with or without --dashed-options, we complete one of the files, whether they have any modifications.

Perhaps you meant to say more like:

    When completing a non-option argument to 'git restore', the
    command line completion support offers names of the files
    present in the working tree as candidates.

to describe the status quo; to hint what the shortcoming of the current behaviour is, we may want to add a bit more, perhaps append the following at the end of that first paragraph:

    But many of these files may not have any changes, and running
    "restore" on them would be a no-op.  Listing only the files, to
    which doing "restore" is not a no-op, would reduce the clutter.
    
Then we'd continue with the solution, while explaining why the exact
choice between modified vs committable was made:

    Offer only the files that are different from the index, to match
    the default behaviour of "git restore" that checks out the
    contents last added to the index to the working tree.  We could
    instead show the files that are different between the index and
    HEAD, and that is more suittable if "git restore --staged" is
    being completed, but this should do for now.

or something. The last part is written in such a way to explicitly signal to future developers that we know we did not do a perfect job and we do not mind if they extend the logic to use something other than "--modified" when appropriate. For example, they could build on this solution to make it inspect the command line for "--staged" and "--source" and drive "diff-index" differently to grab the paths that are offered. We just do not do that at least for now, but we have no objection if other people do so in the future.

Thanks.  Will queue as-is for now.