Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-verify-pack.txt: fix inconsistent spelling of "packfile"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 21, 2015, 04:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqr3qaledb.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150521020402.GA11619@peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Yeah, I agree they should agree with the EBNF. And my inclination is for > "packfile", as it is refering to the concept of the on-the-wire packfile > data (there is no "file ending in .pack" in this context). > > Which I guess argues for a further patch.
I'm fine with that, then.
If I had a time machine, I would have used "pack data" (or "pack stream") vs "pack file" (or ".pack file") to differentiatee (as the pack-protocol is not about transferring any "file", but just carries "pack data"), but that is a rename with more cost than warranted for a minuscule gain at this point.