Re: [PATCH 2/2] repository: allow repository format upgrade with extensions
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Anyway, if we move to "v1" as the default for "git init" anyway, then
> the number of people being helped would become much smaller.
Yup. So in that sense I do not think I care too deeply either way.
Show 11 quoted lines
>> > My preference would be to move forward in 2.28 with the first two
>> > patches in that topic branch (i.e., *not* the third yet), since they
>> > don't produce any user facing behavior that would create danger for
>> > users or clash with this plan.
>>
>> Yup, I agree. I'd give another name to the third commit and then
>> rewind jn/v0-with-extensions-fix by one to prevent mistakes from
>> happening. Thanks.
>
> OK. I was confused to see it still at the tip in the latest What's
> Cooking, but I think we're just crossing emails. :)