Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] maintenance: separate parallelism safe and unsafe tasks

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Nov 18, 2024, 01:32 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqr079jphr.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CAFySSZBioOrfk5O7oni3LRLWasFo6DsuyW7icDDVkiUxq4fNOQ@mail.gmail.com>

Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com> writes:

Show 5 quoted lines

> .... I think for now it makes sense to hold off
> on rerolling this series (at least in the form of auto
> backgrounding/foregrounding tasks) since the purported benefits
> currently aren't worth the churn. Thanks again for the comments on
> this series

So, we'll place this topic on hold, or even eject from the tree to be revisited later?

Thanks.