Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] mailinfo: correct malformed test example

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sep 17, 2016, 03:48 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqpoo3gpa7.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <3a27685f-a53b-03a7-93d5-0492638faf51@google.com>

Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:

Show 7 quoted lines

>   From: bogosity
>     - a list
>     - of stuff
>
> Unchanged, the subsequent patch would break this test because it would
> interpret that as a multi-line "From" in-body header when in-body
> headers are *not* disabled.

Yes, that is totally expected. So I would be perfectly fine if your patch changed the test vector for that case, saying "Allowing a folded in-body header means the expected result for the above three lines has to change".