Re: [RFC 0/7] transitioning to protocol v2

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Aug 25, 2017, 17:48 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqpobjsflp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170825172901.kvquxafudhelxqq3@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

Show 7 quoted lines

> But what if we instead think of it not as "protocol v2" but as "can I
> give the server some hints that it may end up ignoring", then we end up
> with something more like:
>
>   C: please run upload-pack (btw, I'm only interested in refs/heads/foo)
>   S: advertisement + caps (hopefully limited to foo, but client is prepared to receive all)
>   ... etc, as before ...

Nice. The caps that come back can tell us between the cases where they only had refs/heads/foo and nothing else, or if they limited their output to it among many others we told them to ignore, so there is no ambiguity.

> Or alternatively, I guess make this optional to start with, and
> let early adopters turn it on and complain to their server vendors
> for a while before flipping the default to on.

That sounds like a safe transition plan.