Re: [RFC 0/7] transitioning to protocol v2

> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
> 
> > For now I would suggest we put a protocol v2 in place that is
> > the current protocol + a version number coming through the
> > poked hole at the beginning; the goal and review of this series
> > ought to focus on getting the version handshake right...
> 
> Oh, we are in absolute agreement on that.  It would be nice if we
> can have new tests to demonostrate three combinations working well
> (i.e. use 'installed git' whose path is given externally on one end
> of the connection, while the just-built binary sits on the other
> end, in addition to making sure just-built binary successfully talks
> with itself).