Re: [PATCH 4/4] t5326: test propagating hashcache values
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 14, 2021, 02:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpmtbc3o3.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <YT/3BuDa7KfUN/38@nand.local>
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
> Alas, there they are. They are basically no different than having the > name-hash for single pack bitmaps, it's just now we don't throw them > away when generating a MIDX bitmap from a state where the repository > already has a single-pack bitmap.
I actually wasn't expecting any CPU/time difference.
I hope that we are talking about the same name-hash, which is used to sort the blobs so that when pack-objects try to find a good delta base, the blobs from the same path will sit close to each other and hopefully fit in the pack window.
The effect I was hoping to see by not discarding the information was that we find better delta base hence smaller deltas in the resulting packfiles.
Thanks.