Re: [PATCH 3/4] merge options: add a conflict style member
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 9, 2024, 05:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqplw4dkki.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABPp-BFBNDkdL5Z-VOrv2Z3aWaA3OpWFqd6ZGmU9YC8jBRsAog@mail.gmail.com>
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
> a different suffix), I'm still not understanding why ll-merge makes > more sense to you and Phillip than merge-ll. > Could you explain more?
Language and grammar? In other words, "low-level merge routines" is an understandable phrase, while "merge lo-level routines" is not.