Re: [PATCH] t/lib-gpg: adjust permissions for gnupg 2.1
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Orthogonal to that is the pinentry issue: I haven't checked whether
> gpg2.1 asking for passphrases on passphrase-less secure keys is to be
> fixed on the gpg side. If yes, I would just wait for that since gpg2.1
> is not common yet.
>
> If not, we should provide (in gpg config) an alternative pinentry that
> just returns an empty passphrase without bugging the user.
Sounds like a sensible plan to me. Thanks.