From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 16:45:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/lib-gpg: adjust permissions for gnupg 2.1
Message-ID: <xmqqoarkk7gy.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <547EF2B8.3020106@drmicha.warpmail.net>

Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:

> Orthogonal to that is the pinentry issue: I haven't checked whether
> gpg2.1 asking for passphrases on passphrase-less secure keys is to be
> fixed on the gpg side. If yes, I would just wait for that since gpg2.1
> is not common yet.
>
> If not, we should provide (in gpg config) an alternative pinentry that
> just returns an empty passphrase without bugging the user.

Sounds like a sensible plan to me.  Thanks.