Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix a refname trimming problem in `log --bisect`
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 19, 2017, 15:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqo9tkt1qz.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170619091654.vb7krwcmw2y22v7m@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 03:39:40PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: > >> As before, the second patch is optional. If it is omitted, it might >> flush out any other bugs like this one in client code. If it is >> included, regressions are less likely, but we won't learn about other >> misuses of the API. I have no strong opinion either way. > > My feeling is still slightly towards "don't include", but I also don't > have a strong opinion.
I am inclined to the "don't include 2/2 and cook 1/2 alone but a bit longer" approach.
Thanks, both.