From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:51:00 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix a refname trimming problem in `log --bisect`
Message-ID: <xmqqo9tkt1qz.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170619091654.vb7krwcmw2y22v7m@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 03:39:40PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>
>> As before, the second patch is optional. If it is omitted, it might
>> flush out any other bugs like this one in client code. If it is
>> included, regressions are less likely, but we won't learn about other
>> misuses of the API. I have no strong opinion either way.
>
> My feeling is still slightly towards "don't include", but I also don't
> have a strong opinion.

I am inclined to the "don't include 2/2 and cook 1/2 alone but a bit
longer" approach.

Thanks, both.