Re: [PATCH] config: avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len) != len" pattern
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 16, 2017, 05:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqo9o2x04a.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20171115124043.17147-1-phillip.wood@talktalk.net>
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> > > As explained in commit 06f46f237 (avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len) > != len" pattern, 2017–09–13) the return value of write_in_full() is > either -1 or the requested number of bytes. As such comparing the > return value to an unsigned value such as strbuf.len will fail to > catch errors. Change the code to use the preferred '< 0' check.
Thanks, queued. This seems to have come from 9a5abfc7 ("After renaming a section, print any trailing variable definitions", 2009-07-24), which is rather ancient, but was made worse by getting duplicated by 52d59cc6 ("branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m)", 2017-06-18) recently.