Re: [PATCH 0/3] [GSOC][RFC] ref-filter: add contents:raw atom
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 24, 2021, 15:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqo8d0jgxa.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <72ce81a2-68eb-a750-8ca1-425af3cac370@gmail.com>
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> I think we should go with "raw", because the payloads we discussed here > are unmodified. It is akin to "raw data" that is processed further to > produce porcelain output, such as templating engine that process raw > HTML into HTML pages that would be served to end user.
Oh, I can certainly live with --format='%(raw)'; I just view that %(contents:raw) is problematic, especially if we meant to apply it to trees and blobs, because they are not what %(contents) is about.
Thanks.