From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 15:21:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [GSOC][RFC] ref-filter: add contents:raw atom
Message-ID: <xmqqo8d0jgxa.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <72ce81a2-68eb-a750-8ca1-425af3cac370@gmail.com>

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:

> I think we should go with "raw", because the payloads we discussed here
> are unmodified. It is akin to "raw data" that is processed further to
> produce porcelain output, such as templating engine that process raw
> HTML into HTML pages that would be served to end user.

Oh, I can certainly live with --format='%(raw)'; I just view that
%(contents:raw) is problematic, especially if we meant to apply it
to trees and blobs, because they are not what %(contents) is about.

Thanks.