Re: [PATCH v2] commit-slab: declare functions "static inline"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 25, 2013, 20:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmwksxmap.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <89b534b37f5689a675f0f97d3627a0668ce2a71d.1385409724.git.tr@thomasrast.ch>
Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Here's a version that has a fat comment instead of the removal. > > Also, since I was rerolling anyway I put a reason why we need this. > In the original motivation I actually created more functions > afterwards, which made it more convincing, but the problem already > exists.
Thanks.
I considered the bottom one the real declaration (with the top one a forward declaration we need to make the result compile), by the way, so there may be no redundancy anywhere ;-)
Show 61 quoted lines
> commit-slab.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/commit-slab.h b/commit-slab.h
> index d77aaea..21d54f1 100644
> --- a/commit-slab.h
> +++ b/commit-slab.h
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ struct slabname { \
> }; \
> static int stat_ ##slabname## realloc; \
> \
> -static void init_ ##slabname## _with_stride(struct slabname *s, \
> - unsigned stride) \
> +static inline void init_ ##slabname## _with_stride(struct slabname *s, \
> + unsigned stride) \
> { \
> unsigned int elem_size; \
> if (!stride) \
> @@ -58,12 +58,12 @@ struct slabname { \
> s->slab = NULL; \
> } \
> \
> -static void init_ ##slabname(struct slabname *s) \
> +static inline void init_ ##slabname(struct slabname *s) \
> { \
> init_ ##slabname## _with_stride(s, 1); \
> } \
> \
> -static void clear_ ##slabname(struct slabname *s) \
> +static inline void clear_ ##slabname(struct slabname *s) \
> { \
> int i; \
> for (i = 0; i < s->slab_count; i++) \
> @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ struct slabname { \
> s->slab = NULL; \
> } \
> \
> -static elemtype *slabname## _at(struct slabname *s, \
> - const struct commit *c) \
> +static inline elemtype *slabname## _at(struct slabname *s, \
> + const struct commit *c) \
> { \
> int nth_slab, nth_slot; \
> \
> @@ -98,4 +98,16 @@ struct slabname { \
> \
> static int stat_ ##slabname## realloc
>
> +/*
> + * Note that this seemingly redundant second declaration is required
> + * to allow a terminating semicolon, which makes instantiations look
> + * like function declarations. I.e., the expansion of
> + *
> + * define_commit_slab(indegree, int);
> + *
> + * ends in 'static int stat_indegreerealloc;'. This would otherwise
> + * be a syntax error according (at least) to ISO C. It's hard to
> + * catch because GCC silently parses it by default.
> + */
> +
> #endif /* COMMIT_SLAB_H */