Re: An idea for "git bisect" and a GSoC enquiry
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 12, 2014, 18:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmwgvmfpk.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAL0uuq0LpQTQPeNVJgKGS2YLTT0gi_BM0wi02c0EP+kvBE4DyA@mail.gmail.com>
Jacopo Notarstefano <jacopo.notarstefano@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> I think you fundamentally cannot use two labels that are merely >> "distinct" and bisect correctly. You need to know which ones >> (i.e. good) are to be excluded and the other (i.e. bad) are to be >> included when computing the "remaining to be tested" set of commits. > > Good point. Yes, this isn't viable.
But if you make them into --no-longer-X vs --still-X, then it will be viable without us knowing what X means.