Re: An idea for "git bisect" and a GSoC enquiry
- From
Jacopo Notarstefano <jacopo.notarstefano@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 12, 2014, 01:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAL0uuq0LpQTQPeNVJgKGS2YLTT0gi_BM0wi02c0EP+kvBE4DyA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqr46jqgfq.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> I think you fundamentally cannot use two labels that are merely > "distinct" and bisect correctly. You need to know which ones > (i.e. good) are to be excluded and the other (i.e. bad) are to be > included when computing the "remaining to be tested" set of commits.
Good point. Yes, this isn't viable.