Re: co-authoring commits
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 17, 2015, 20:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmvzy59zr.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOvwQ4j2bjR1jnLVyZbw1OCE=xQxbCEFGKcK1bpuv1K3s_Y2EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Is this something that breaks the design and would never be >> > implemented, >> >> Yes. > > Junio, thanks for the quick response. > > I suppose things have changed since Jonathan Nieder's response in [1] > (2010),...
I do not think there is anything changed. Jonathan was being a bit more diplomatic and academic than I am.
"There is no reason in principle some faraway future version of Git could" is _always_ true as a mental masturbation without taking reality into account, aka "Sounds doable but a lot of trouble" means "it is doable but it is dubious that it is worth doing".