Re: co-authoring commits
- From
- Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 17, 2015, 20:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOvwQ4j2bjR1jnLVyZbw1OCE=xQxbCEFGKcK1bpuv1K3s_Y2EQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq4mm66r99.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com> writes: > > > Is this something that breaks the design and would never be > > implemented, > > Yes.
Junio, thanks for the quick response.
I suppose things have changed since Jonathan Nieder's response in [1] (2010), or I've read too much into the mini-thread between Jonathan and Josh. I was under the impression that this is generally possible without shaking up all underpinnings.
For what it's worth, here's why I would use the feature:
By allowing multiple authors, you don't have to decide who's the primary author, as in such situations usually there is no primary at all. I sometimes deliberately override the author when committing and add myself just as another co-author in the commit message, but as others have noted it would be really great if we can just specify multiple authors.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=451880