Re: [PATCH] drop support for "experimental" loose objects
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 22, 2013, 17:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqli0g1hbf.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20131122095801.GB12042@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> I guess we would need to audit all the sha1_object_info callers.
Yup; I agree that was the conclusion of Christian's thread.