Re: [PATCH] push: disable lazy --force-with-lease by default
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 7, 2017, 15:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqlgo0cm7f.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <8760f4bmig.fsf@gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
> Which is why I think we should take Francesco's patch (with fixes from > feedback), instead of Junio's.
The patch in this discussion is not meant as a replacement for the one from Francesco. It was meant as a companion patch.
As I view the form of the option that relies on the stability of remote-tracking branches strictly worse than the honest "--force" that loudly advertises itself as dangerous (as opposed to being advertised as a safer option, when it isn't), I consider the change to require users to opt into relying on remote-tracking branches as a prerequisite before we can recommend the form as a safer version of "--force".