From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 15:15:32 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] push: disable lazy --force-with-lease by default
Message-ID: <xmqqlgo0cm7f.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <8760f4bmig.fsf@gmail.com>

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

> Which is why I think we should take Francesco's patch (with fixes from
> feedback), instead of Junio's.

The patch in this discussion is not meant as a replacement for the
one from Francesco.  It was meant as a companion patch.  

As I view the form of the option that relies on the stability of
remote-tracking branches strictly worse than the honest "--force"
that loudly advertises itself as dangerous (as opposed to being
advertised as a safer option, when it isn't), I consider the change
to require users to opt into relying on remote-tracking branches as
a prerequisite before we can recommend the form as a safer version
of "--force".