Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Darcy's "date underflow fix" topic, final reroll

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Jun 26, 2024, 18:32 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqle2rzh9o.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <dedaa590-b9bf-498f-b743-ba058cba8486@gmail.com>

Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:

Show 16 quoted lines

> Hi Junio
>
> On 26/06/2024 00:12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> So it has been some time since we discussed this topic.  Let's clean
>> up the messy "SQUASH???" patches I had to queue on top of the main
>> patch to keep the CI working and make them into a preliminary patch.
>> The tree at the end of the series is identical to what has been
>> queued in 'seen' for the past few weeks.  The only difference is
>> that we first lay groundwork to skip certain time-parsing tests on
>> 32-bit systems first, and then use Darcy's patch with minimum
>> adjustments for 32-bit systems.
>
> I've had a read through this verison and I don't have anything to add
> to Eric's comments.
>
> Best Wishes

Thanks, let's mark it for 'next' then.