Re: [PATCH v3 19/27] refs: add a concept of a reference transaction
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> In retrospect, you might have been objecting more to the misleading
> docstring than to the behavior as implemented at the time.
Yeah, I was reacting to the comment that said create can delete ;-)
Show 5 quoted lines
> The
> docstring implied that create could actually be used to delete a
> reference, but that was not true: it always checked that the reference
> didn't exist beforehand. So at worst it could leave a non-existent
> reference un-created.
>> (2) keep the assert(), reject such user input at the callers, and
>> document that these are invalid inputs;
>
> The current status in v3 is that (2) is implemented.