From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 07:40:56 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 19/27] refs: add a concept of a reference transaction Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <534CC69C.1020503@alum.mit.edu> Michael Haggerty writes: > In retrospect, you might have been objecting more to the misleading > docstring than to the behavior as implemented at the time. Yeah, I was reacting to the comment that said create can delete ;-) > The > docstring implied that create could actually be used to delete a > reference, but that was not true: it always checked that the reference > didn't exist beforehand. So at worst it could leave a non-existent > reference un-created. OK, all is clear then. >> (2) keep the assert(), reject such user input at the callers, and >> document that these are invalid inputs; > > The current status in v3 is that (2) is implemented. Good. Thanks.