Re: [PATCH 3/5] git-jump: admit to passing merge mode args to ls-files
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 3, 2023, 20:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqjzs3xwm1.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cQHAK2_LEG0-6MTF52t2D8b_SRxzB51B_4N35ujtGeb6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
>> There's even an example of such usage in the README. >> >> Signed-off-by: Štěpán Němec <stepnem@smrk.net> >> --- >> diff --git a/contrib/git-jump/git-jump b/contrib/git-jump/git-jump >> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ The <mode> parameter is one of: >> >> diff: elements are diff hunks. Arguments are given to diff. >> >> -merge: elements are merge conflicts. Arguments are ignored. >> +merge: elements are merge conflicts. Arguments are given to ls-files -u. > > Should "ls-files -u" be formatted with backticks? > > Arguments are passed to `git ls-files -u`.
Probably not in this case, as this is end-user visible help message that is not formatted but given to the terminal.
The whole preimage looks like this:
usage: git jump [--stdout] <mode> [<args>]
Jump to interesting elements in an editor.
The <mode> parameter is one of:diff: elements are diff hunks. Arguments are given to diff.
merge: elements are merge conflicts. Arguments are ignored.
grep: elements are grep hits. Arguments are given to git grep or, if
configured, to the command in `jump.grepCmd`.ws: elements are whitespace errors. Arguments are given to diff --check.
If the optional argument `--stdout` is given, print the quickfix
lines to standard output instead of feeding it to the editor.and it is already a mixture. "given to `git grep`" is not quoted, neither is "given to `diff --check`" or "given to `diff`"
I think rule for help/usage messages should be that
- anything that the end-user may want to cut&paste should be left alone to make it easier to cut,
- but at the same time the message should make it clear which part of a sentence is what,
Clicking on `--stdout` or `jump.grepCmd` does not include the surrounding quotes, at least in my environment, so the use of backquotes in these places satisfy the two goals, it seems.
Unlike `--stdout` and `jump.grepCmd`, all other things that are not quoted, including the one that is added by this patch (i.e., "ls-files -u"), are something the end-user needs to cut and paste in reaction to seeing this error message, so as long as they are understandable in the sentences they appear in, I think they are fine.
If we wanted to standardize, we may start to encourage consistent use of quoting, but I do not think it should be part of this topic.
Thanks for being careful and thoughtful.