Re: [PATCH 2/7] [doc] git-merge: link to new merge conflicts guide
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 2, 2026, 21:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqjynzvl4w.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <7861e492-6fa4-4768-afdd-65cd346b85be@app.fastmail.com>
"Julia Evans" <julia@jvns.ca> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
>> - "cannot guess" would be more direct than "will not try to guess". > > The way I think about it as a user is that Git takes an intentionally conservative > approach and I appreciate the conservatism. Compared to a more aggressive > syntax-aware merge system like `mergiraf` which has done merges I don't > agree with.
Your disagreement with their result suggests that they guessed when they could not do so reliably. I agree that our approach is more conservative, but we can call it being more honest.
;-).