Re: [PATCH] pathspec: rename free_pathspec() to clear_pathspec()
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 2, 2016, 22:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqinxrs0yk.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160602212938.GA13071@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> I think diff_filespec_clear() would not be quite right. It is freeing > only the allocated _data_, but leaving the other portions intact.
You are (as usual) more right than I am ;-)
Yes, the free_data() is designed to retain enough information about the filespec so that the data can be re-read by the next person who needs to access it after free_data() is called; i.e. it was a measure to reduce the memory pressure by trading it off with I/O cost. It is wrong to name it "clear", which is to "clear the slate, make it into pristine state" whose side effect is to release held resources.