Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 3/3] branch: add copy branch feature implementation
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 6, 2017, 12:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqink98gsd.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACBZZX5OS_cz_mo4rpd+=DGtyN4SfipGrOXwVHJisv3CywoFaw@mail.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:10 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > >> When somebody says "I want to rename my current branch to X", it is >> clear that the person wants to end up being on a branch called X. >> >> To me, "I want to copy my current branch to Y" sounds more like "I >> want to create another Y that looks just like the current branch, >> but I want stay on my current branch". > > This would be more useful to me if the semantics were copy & checkout > instead of just copy, since when I'd like to copy branches it's almost > always because I'm on some topic branch and want to create & work on a > new copy of that topic branch. > > It would also be consistent with "git branch -m" and easier to > explain, i.e. "git branch -c just like -m except it doesn't delete the > branch name/config you moved away from".
The way I would use this feature, I'd imagine, would be to stash away the current state of the branch before I try to do something potentially stupid, and then recover the original state by reverting back, i.e.
$ git branch -c master backup
... do silly things to the master branch ...
... ok, enough silliness. go back to sane state ...
$ git branch -M backup masterHaving said that, I think it is merely the matter of personal taste and there is no single "right" definition. I do not have a strong feeling either way.
To play devil's advocate, I'd anticipate a criticism, if we take your interpretation (which I do not _mind_, even though I do not have strong feeling _for_ it), saying "I just told you to _copy_ it. If I wanted to check it out, I'd do that myself. Why are you doing more than I asked, stupid Git."
I have to say upfront that against such a criticism, I won't defend your position myself.