Re: [PATCH 2/4] mark_parents_uninteresting(): drop missing object check
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 13, 2018, 02:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqin7se1jd.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180511180158.GB12543@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> 2. It "lies" about the commit by setting the parsed flag, > even though we didn't load any useful data into the > struct. This shouldn't matter for the UNINTERESTING > case, but we may later clear our flags and do another > traversal in the same process. While pretty unlikely, > it's possible that we could then look at the same > commit without the UNINTERESTING flag,...
Yeah, if two ranges given to tbdiff to be compared are computed in-core, uninteresting boundary of one range is likely to be interesting on the other range.