Re: [PATCH 2/4] reftable/merged: fix zero-sized allocation when there are no readers
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 21, 2024, 17:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqikrdc63c.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <b4ba502a-b689-4736-9712-443a137b5d2c@app.fastmail.com>
"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Hi > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2024, at 12:50, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> It was reported [1c > > A Neo user, I see. > > s/c/]/ > >> [snip] >> the result. Now that we do we notice and thus return an out-of-memory >> error to the caller. > > s/Now that we do we/Now we do notice/ > > Repeat of “we”. And “that” can’t be be used since it has nothing to > connect to.
I read "Now that we do, we notice and ..." a perfectly sensible construct, though.
Thanks.