Re: [PATCH v2] progress: pay attention to (customized) delay time
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 25, 2025, 22:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqh5xvnhek.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <7b848623-ce64-4679-9b5e-9d91d947b269@kdbg.org>
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
> Compared to the first round, this replaces sig_atomic_t by int. I > didn't use bool just in case the patch goes on top of a maintenance > track that does not have the "bool is allowed" policy.
That's fair. I happened to have chosen v2.51.0 as the base for v1 during today's integration, but as a fix-up topic, you are correct to point out that I should apply this on top of maint-2.50 or even older.
Thanks, will requeue.