From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 22:52:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] progress: pay attention to (customized) delay time
Message-ID: <xmqqh5xvnhek.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <7b848623-ce64-4679-9b5e-9d91d947b269@kdbg.org>

Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:

>  Compared to the first round, this replaces sig_atomic_t by int. I
>  didn't use bool just in case the patch goes on top of a maintenance
>  track that does not have the "bool is allowed" policy.

That's fair.  I happened to have chosen v2.51.0 as the base for v1
during today's integration, but as a fix-up topic, you are correct
to point out that I should apply this on top of maint-2.50 or even
older.

Thanks, will requeue.