Re: [PATCH] refspec: make @ a valid refspec
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 25, 2020, 00:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqft4ygtvl.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+P7+xp_iTnkdbWoDSRZustvjk5BRJOPD=snae8D1Fe_uXqO7g@mail.gmail.com>
Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Of course I agree that "@ == HEAD" can't be used to go *backwards* > through that logic at all. But if you're moving forwards through it, > then "@" on its own can make sense as HEAD, but only as an implication > of "the most recent version of the current branch can't be anything > else"
I'd rather put the lame excuses behind and accept that we ended up with an ugly and illogical synonym that ;-)
And making it consistently available in places where HEAD is accepted is a good thing. Depending on the keyboard, it may be easy to type, too.