Re: [PATCH v1] git-p4: place temporary refs used for branch import under ref/git-p4-tmp
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 28, 2016, 18:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqeg7h87yg.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <5772C00C.6000403@kdbg.org>
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
Show 25 quoted lines
> Am 27.06.2016 um 09:26 schrieb larsxschneider@gmail.com:
>> --- a/git-p4.py
>> +++ b/git-p4.py
>> @@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ class P4Sync(Command, P4UserMap):
>> self.useClientSpec_from_options = False
>> self.clientSpecDirs = None
>> self.tempBranches = []
>> - self.tempBranchLocation = "git-p4-tmp"
>> + self.tempBranchLocation = "refs/git-p4-tmp"
>> self.largeFileSystem = None
>>
>> if gitConfig('git-p4.largeFileSystem'):
>> diff --git a/t/t9801-git-p4-branch.sh b/t/t9801-git-p4-branch.sh
>> index 0aafd03..8f28ed2 100755
>> --- a/t/t9801-git-p4-branch.sh
>> +++ b/t/t9801-git-p4-branch.sh
>> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git p4 clone complex branches' '
>> test_path_is_file file2 &&
>> test_path_is_file file3 &&
>> ! grep update file2 &&
>> - test_path_is_missing .git/git-p4-tmp
>> + test_path_is_missing .git/ref/git-p4-tmp
>
> This should be .git/refs/git-p4-tmp, no? Otherwise, this does not test
> what it should test.Yes, and it probably should use "git show-ref --verify" to future-proof, instead of assuming the file-based ref backend.
Show 17 quoted lines
> >> ) >> ' >> >> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git p4 sync changes to two branches in the same changelist' >> test_path_is_file file2 && >> test_path_is_file file3 && >> ! grep update file2 && >> - test_path_is_missing .git/git-p4-tmp >> + test_path_is_missing .git/ref/git-p4-tmp > > Same here. > >> ) >> ' > > -- Hannes