From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:49:27 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] git-p4: place temporary refs used for branch import under ref/git-p4-tmp
Message-ID: <xmqqeg7h87yg.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <5772C00C.6000403@kdbg.org>

Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:

> Am 27.06.2016 um 09:26 schrieb larsxschneider@gmail.com:
>> --- a/git-p4.py
>> +++ b/git-p4.py
>> @@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ class P4Sync(Command, P4UserMap):
>>           self.useClientSpec_from_options = False
>>           self.clientSpecDirs = None
>>           self.tempBranches = []
>> -        self.tempBranchLocation = "git-p4-tmp"
>> +        self.tempBranchLocation = "refs/git-p4-tmp"
>>           self.largeFileSystem = None
>>
>>           if gitConfig('git-p4.largeFileSystem'):
>> diff --git a/t/t9801-git-p4-branch.sh b/t/t9801-git-p4-branch.sh
>> index 0aafd03..8f28ed2 100755
>> --- a/t/t9801-git-p4-branch.sh
>> +++ b/t/t9801-git-p4-branch.sh
>> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git p4 clone complex branches' '
>>   		test_path_is_file file2 &&
>>   		test_path_is_file file3 &&
>>   		! grep update file2 &&
>> -		test_path_is_missing .git/git-p4-tmp
>> +		test_path_is_missing .git/ref/git-p4-tmp
>
> This should be .git/refs/git-p4-tmp, no? Otherwise, this does not test
> what it should test.

Yes, and it probably should use "git show-ref --verify" to
future-proof, instead of assuming the file-based ref backend.

>
>>   	)
>>   '
>>
>> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git p4 sync changes to two branches in the same changelist'
>>   		test_path_is_file file2 &&
>>   		test_path_is_file file3 &&
>>   		! grep update file2 &&
>> -		test_path_is_missing .git/git-p4-tmp
>> +		test_path_is_missing .git/ref/git-p4-tmp
>
> Same here.
>
>>   	)
>>   '
>
> -- Hannes