Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] sequencer: finish parsing the todo list despite an invalid first line

> The structure of this new test piece, including the use of "log -1
> --format", seems to follow existing tests, and very readable.  Why
> do we have one extra level of subshell, though?  There is no "cd"
> that may affect the later test pieces, and set_something_editor that
> touches environment that may affect the later test pieces is called
> in its own subshell already.
>
> Other than that, looking good (there may be a valid reason why the
> test piece needs the subshell around it, but it was just not apparent
> to me).