Re: [PATCH 12/12] Revert "fetch/clone: detect dubious ownership of local repositories"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 22, 2024, 17:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqed9t69x6.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <6e493925-f3f6-43aa-4381-612067e87d01@gmx.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> To https://github.com/dscho/git > + c6da96aa5f0...f71d7009814 maint-2.39 -> tentative/maint-2.39 (forced update) > + fff57b200d1...21dc6c4d521 maint-2.40 -> tentative/maint-2.40 (forced update) > + 616450032a0...0d21b3451cd maint-2.41 -> tentative/maint-2.41 (forced update) > + b1ea89bc2d6...e9bd0c8f8c4 maint-2.42 -> tentative/maint-2.42 (forced update) > + 093c42a6c6b...9926037ce8c maint-2.43 -> tentative/maint-2.43 (forced update) > + 3c7a7b923b3...aec5a9bf52c maint-2.44 -> tentative/maint-2.44 (forced update) > + aeddcb02756...d3c56966d13 maint-2.45 -> tentative/maint-2.45 (forced update) > > This command-line comes up with no differences (meaning: you resolved the > merge conflicts, even the ones without conflict markers, in the same way > as I did, which is good):
Yeah, but I am afraid that it is a bit too premature to worry about the integration to merge them up. What's your take on the symlink stuff Joey raised recently?
Thanks.