Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2025, #02; Mon, 7)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 10, 2025, 00:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqecuoap89.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <aG6A19ZgxwpdJuow@nand.local>
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
Show 29 quoted lines
>> * tb/midx-avoid-cruft-packs (2025-06-23) 9 commits
>> - repack: exclude cruft pack(s) from the MIDX where possible
>> - pack-objects: introduce '--stdin-packs=follow'
>> - pack-objects: swap 'show_{object,commit}_pack_hint'
>> - pack-objects: fix typo in 'show_object_pack_hint()'
>> - pack-objects: perform name-hash traversal for unpacked objects
>> - pack-objects: declare 'rev_info' for '--stdin-packs' earlier
>> - pack-objects: factor out handling '--stdin-packs'
>> - pack-objects: limit scope in 'add_object_entry_from_pack()'
>> - pack-objects: use standard option incompatibility functions
>>
>> "pack-objects" has been taught to avoid pointing into objects in
>> cruft packs from midx.
>>
>> Will merge to 'next'?
>> source: <cover.1750717921.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
>
> I think that this one is ready to go. Since Elijah and Peff last
> reviewed it, it hasn't changed substantially (other than a few
> bugfix-related changes that were discovered while rolling this out at
> GitHub).
>
> The series has been running on GitHub's production infrastructure for
> the last month or two without issue, so I think this is good from a
> stability perspective.
>
> I've CC'd Elijah and Peff here, since they were the last two to review
> the series, but I don't think that they have any objections to this
> moving along.OK. As they both seem to be active, let me wait for a bit and then mark it for 'next' unless we hear anything unexpected.
Thanks.