Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2025, #02; Mon, 7)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 5:01 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 37 quoted lines
>
> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> >> * tb/midx-avoid-cruft-packs (2025-06-23) 9 commits
> >> - repack: exclude cruft pack(s) from the MIDX where possible
> >> - pack-objects: introduce '--stdin-packs=follow'
> >> - pack-objects: swap 'show_{object,commit}_pack_hint'
> >> - pack-objects: fix typo in 'show_object_pack_hint()'
> >> - pack-objects: perform name-hash traversal for unpacked objects
> >> - pack-objects: declare 'rev_info' for '--stdin-packs' earlier
> >> - pack-objects: factor out handling '--stdin-packs'
> >> - pack-objects: limit scope in 'add_object_entry_from_pack()'
> >> - pack-objects: use standard option incompatibility functions
> >>
> >> "pack-objects" has been taught to avoid pointing into objects in
> >> cruft packs from midx.
> >>
> >> Will merge to 'next'?
> >> source: <cover.1750717921.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
> >
> > I think that this one is ready to go. Since Elijah and Peff last
> > reviewed it, it hasn't changed substantially (other than a few
> > bugfix-related changes that were discovered while rolling this out at
> > GitHub).
> >
> > The series has been running on GitHub's production infrastructure for
> > the last month or two without issue, so I think this is good from a
> > stability perspective.
> >
> > I've CC'd Elijah and Peff here, since they were the last two to review
> > the series, but I don't think that they have any objections to this
> > moving along.
>
> OK. As they both seem to be active, let me wait for a bit and then
> mark it for 'next' unless we hear anything unexpected.
>
> Thanks.Yep, I think this version is good to merge to next; thanks.