Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Better heuristics make prettier diffs
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 19, 2016, 16:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqd1jzho2l.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <c381d458-4c81-f46c-592a-98957b3a177c@alum.mit.edu>
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On 09/08/2016 01:25 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes: >> >>> * Add test t4059 as part of this commit, not as part of its >>> successor. >> >> Which needs to be moved to somewhere else, as another topics that >> has already been in 'next' uses t4059. >> >> I'd move it temporarily to t4061 with a separate SQUASH??? at the >> tip for now, as I am running out of time today. > > I didn't realize you were waiting for an ACK. Yes, it's totally OK to > rename the test.
I actually wasn't asking for an Ack.
As the issue was in the one that is buried a few commits from the tip, and there is a later one that adds more tests to it, I didn't find enough energy to rename the new file in a buried commit and then adjust the patch later updates it, I was hoping that you'd reroll to save me effort, rather than forcing me to do the rebase myself ;-).