Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] builtin/commit: error out when passing untracked path with -i
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 29, 2024, 21:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqcyrcwwfj.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <20240329205649.1483032-4-shyamthakkar001@gmail.com>
Ghanshyam Thakkar <shyamthakkar001@gmail.com> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> When we provide a pathspec which does not match any tracked path > alongside --include, we do not error like without --include. If there > is something staged, it will commit the staged changes and ignore the > pathspec which does not match any tracked path. And if nothing is > staged, it will print the status. Exit code is 0 in both cases (unlike > without --include). This is also described in the TODO comment before > the relevant testcase. > > Fix this by passing a character array to add_files_to_cache() to > collect the pathspec matching information and error out if the given > path is untracked. Also, amend the testcase to check for the error > message and remove the TODO comment. > > Signed-off-by: Ghanshyam Thakkar <shyamthakkar001@gmail.com> > --- > builtin/commit.c | 9 ++++++++- > t/t7501-commit-basic-functionality.sh | 16 +--------------- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Nice.
Show 20 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
> index 24efeaca98..355f25ec2a 100644
> --- a/builtin/commit.c
> +++ b/builtin/commit.c
> @@ -441,10 +441,17 @@ static const char *prepare_index(const char **argv, const char *prefix,
> * (B) on failure, rollback the real index.
> */
> if (all || (also && pathspec.nr)) {
> + char *ps_matched = xcalloc(pathspec.nr, 1);
> repo_hold_locked_index(the_repository, &index_lock,
> LOCK_DIE_ON_ERROR);
> add_files_to_cache(the_repository, also ? prefix : NULL,
> - &pathspec, NULL, 0, 0);
> + &pathspec, ps_matched, 0, 0);
> + if (!all && report_path_error(ps_matched, &pathspec)) {
> + free(ps_matched);
> + exit(1);
> + }
> + free(ps_matched);
> +Looking simple and very nice.
This change would not have to be redone even if we decide not to add a new parameter to run_diff_files() and instead add a new member to the revs structure instead, because it all happens at the level or below add_files_to_cache().