Re: [PATCH 2/2] packfile: fix corruption due to stale delta base cache entries

> Ah, I get it now. It is a little funny to key the hash on the in-core
> pointer we happen to have, but it does provide a certain uniqueness. I
> suspect that doing this would be mostly correct:
> ...
> and would trigger the use-after-free, but:
>
>   1. It introduces weird semantic questions, like: what if you freed and
>      then reopened a pack of the same name and it didn't have the same
>      contents?
>
>   2. It's more expensive.
>
>   3. Changing the bug from "hard to detect hash equality mismatch" to
>      "undefined behavior" is not really much of an improvement. ;)
>
> So I think just fixing the bug is good, along with accepting that it
> only triggered in certain specific cases and testing that. And your
> patch looks like the obviously correct fix.