Re: [RFC] Code reorgnization
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 17, 2016, 16:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqbn6d13f5.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160317111136.GA21745@lanh>
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
> Good? Bad? Ugly?
Too fine-grained to induce confusion for things that have to work as a bridge between two categories (e.g. odb & index). In short, bad and ugly.
I am OK with a looser classification e.g. (1) things that can be used without Git at all like strbuf, string-list vs (2) things that are Git but shared across different subcommands like read-cache, sha1_file, vs (3) command implementations (e.g. builtin/ and also standalone).