Re: Possible bug in includeIf / conditional includes
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 11, 2017, 07:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqbmqzbzh0.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170511074257.xueofze3dv3xwrql@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 09:19:50AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > >> 1. It says "The included file is expanded immediately, as if its >> contents had been found at the location of the include directive.". At >> first I thought this referred to glob expansion, not >> s/expanded/interpolated/, the example section uses "expand" in the >> context of pathnames, which caused the confusion. > > Perhaps it should say "The contents of the included file are expanded > immediately, as if they had been found at..."?
Or s/expanded/inserted/, perhaps? The word "expand" does not quite click to me in this context. Just like Ævar, I associate the word with an act of replacing some template-with-blank with the result of blanks-in-the-template-filled.
Regarding 2. and 3., I agree with your comments.
Thanks.